Existential questions from people who think (far too much).
We share, or have already shared with you, a few doubts and questions.
This FAQ puts an end to them.
Good news: neither did we. (Well… before Homnès.)
Sticky hair at the back of the head? Straw hair? No thank you.
The goal is princess hair. Or prince hair. Or both.
First, let us be clear: WHY do we call it “solid shampoo”? Since when is the selling point of a hair product its shape? Nobody sells a table by saying: “look, it is rectangular!” (Fine… ok, bad example. But you get the idea.)
Anyway, back to Homnès. We formulate to solve real hair problems.
Real hair, on real heads, in real life. And it turns out that while designing our products, we realized something (that we already knew, let us be honest): water serves no purpose in a shampoo formula.
So no water = no plastic bottle = less waste = more performance. QED.
Otherwise, it is exactly like a liquid shampoo. Except it lathers better. It smells better. And it really works.
This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.
This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.
This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.
This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.
This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.
This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.