Ça tombe bien : nous non plus. (Enfin… avant Homnès.)

Les cheveux poisseux derrière la tête ? Les cheveux de paille ? Non merci.

Le but est d'avoir des cheveux de princesse. Ou de prince. Ou des deux.

Déjà, soyons clairs : POURQUOI appelons-nous ça “shampoing solide” ? Depuis quand l’argument de vente d’un soin, c’est sa forme ? Personne ne vend une table en disant : “regardez, elle est rectangulaire !” (Bon… ok, mauvais exemple. Mais vous voyez l’idée.)

Bref, revenons à Homnès. Nous formulons pour résoudre de vrais problèmes capillaires.

Des vrais cheveux, sur des vraies têtes, dans la vraie vie. Et il s’avère qu’au moment de concevoir nos produits, nous nous sommes rendu compte de quelque chose (que l'on savait déjà, soyons honnêtes) : l’eau ne sert à rien dans une formule de shampoing.
Donc pas d’eau = pas de flacon plastique = moins de gâchis = plus de performance. CQFD.

Et sinon, c’est tout pareil qu’un shampoing liquide. Sauf que ça mousse mieux. Ça sent meilleur. Et ça marche vraiment.

This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.

This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.

This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.

This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.

This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.

This is an example of a response that you might give. It's good to be as thorough as possible in responses as that has a tendency to improve trust overall.